Why must SCOTUS Ruling on Presidential Immunity have retroactive effect? By Wumi Akintide

Advertisement

 

Why must the SCOTUS Ruling made and delivered on July 1st, 2024 have retrospective effect on crimes committed when the status quo interpretation of the Constitution forcefully argued and believed that nobody and not even the President is above the Law

Why must the Ruling have retroactive effect?

Is SCOTUS now saying that America now owes Richard Nixon an apology for insisting his Presidential papers have to be turned over to FBI and the DOJ?

Any of you reading this should realize it was that decision or ruling by the SCOTUS that had forced Richard Nixon to resign.

Advertisement

The whole nation must accept the suggestion by. Nancy Pelosi that both Trump and Biden must submit to Mental Fitness Test to determine if they are both fit to run for President or not.

Since the great majority of voters think that both candidates are by the far oldest candidates to ever run for President, the results of that test would determine whether the two of them should remain in the race or drop out.

If the SCOTUS Ruling on 1st of July is allowed to take retroactive effect, it simply means all decisions and convictions handed down in America based on the existential interpretation of the Constitution and what it says about immunity whether absolute, limited or presumptive, would have to be retried again or modified or canceled altogether leading to a colossal waste of money and terrible Injustice for those affected.

The new Ruling should not take effect for all Federal cases earlier than the date it was formally issued and delivered.

It is a travesty of Justice that Donald Trump’s lawyer have now filed a motion saying that all the cases or crimes he had committed and was convicted for under the old interpretation of the Law and the Constitution must be wiped off the docket.

The new power grab by the Justice Robert-led SCOTUS to deny rights to people under their new interpretation of the Law as it now stands. should not be allowed to be backdated is what I am saying.

The Ruling should only take effect from the date it was issued and delivered and not made retroactive.

I am not a Board-certified lawyer but It defies logic and common sense to argue that a ruling made on July 1st, 2024 should be backdated just to cover crimes committed years before the new ruling or interpretation was made.

Somebody has to speak up on this before it is too late.

The SCOTUS should have raised this point by itself but it would not do so because his motive or intent is just to help Donald Trump beat the rap by delaying its decision to the very last day on its Calendar.

Judge Merchan would not have needed to move his sentencing from July 11th to September 18, 48 days later if this observation is factored into their equation.

Thank God. Karine Jean-Pierre the White House Press Secretary Secretary who had been missing in action for some time, is now back today probably from vacation to do her job.

I rest my case.

Share your story or advertise with us: Whatsapp: +2347068606071 Email: info@newspotng.com