WHEN STUDENT BEATS MASTER – Mike Awoyinfa Column

Advertisement

It was a battle of epic proportions, one that echoes the biblical story of David versus Goliath with all its shockers, moral lessons and the unexplainable spiritual irony of the unfancied underdog miraculously bringing down and humiliating the mighty in battle.

In the sweltering heat of Miami where a tennis war had been delayed for hours by rain, there he stood, dressed in green, a tennis Goliath by name Novak Djokovic who had achieved enough to be a candidate for the greatest tennis player of all time. Dressed in red was his opponent, a 19-year-old Jakub Mensik, a relatively unknown tennis prodigy who stepped onto the biggest stage of his life and did the unthinkable: he defeated the legendary Novak Djokovic, not by luck, not by fluke, but by sheer grit, fearless play, and two nerve-wracking tiebreakers ending in 7-6, 7-6.

With the help of coffee, I had kept myself awake all through the night waiting for this encounter between a tennis giant and the young man from the Czech Republic whom I hadn’t heard of until this Miami Open where he kept winning one game after the other until he got to the finals. What kept me awake is my love for underdogs. Just like me, many had come to see how Djokovic would teach this protégé or pretender a lesson.

Little did we know that Jakub right from the beginning had been a student of Djokovic. This made the story even more interesting. The report we got was that it was Djokovic who inspired him to learn the game of tennis. As a kid, he had posters of Djokovic on his wall. At the age of eight, he would stay up late, watching Djokovic’s matches with wide-eyed admiration. He mimicked his idol’s playing style, pored over videos of his movement, and even practiced Djokovic’s signature backhand against a wall for hours.

His family wasn’t wealthy, and affording proper coaching was a struggle. But what Jakub lacked in resources, he made up for in sheer determination. He strung together an old racket with makeshift strings when he couldn’t afford a new one. He practiced on cracked courts, sometimes playing against imaginary opponents when no one was available. By age 15, he was making waves in junior tournaments, and by 18, he had made his way into professional tennis. But he was still far from being considered a serious contender. When he qualified for his first Grand Slam, he couldn’t believe his luck. But fate had something bigger in store—an improbable final against the man he had idolized for more than a decade.

Advertisement

The odds were stacked against Jakub. Djokovic was in peak form, having steamrolled his way to yet another final. Such was his form that everyone expected him to easily override the young man. The media barely mentioned Jakub, apart from calling him “the kid who worships Djokovic.” But inside, Jakub wasn’t intimidated. He reminded himself why he started playing tennis in the first place. This wasn’t just an opponent. It was an opportunity to write his name in tennis history.

As the players walked onto the court, the atmosphere was electric. The world expected Djokovic to add yet another title to his already historic career. But Jakub had other ideas. He beat his hero in two gripping tiebreakers.

ECHOES OF MUHAMMAD ALI VERSUS LARRY HOLMES

Novak Djokovic’s stunning defeat at the hands of 19-year-old Jakub Mensik in Miami reminds me of Muhammad Ali’s humbling loss to Larry Holmes in 1980. Both were iconic figures, titans of their respective sports, facing a younger, hungry challenger with a connection to their past.

Ali, once the embodiment of invincibility, entered the ring against Holmes, his former sparring partner, a man who had absorbed the master’s lessons. Djokovic, similarly, faced Mensik, a rising star who, like countless others, grew up idolizing the Serbian legend. The parallels, while not exact, cast a long shadow, prompting reflection on the passage of time and the inevitable decline of even the greatest.

Both Ali and Djokovic carried the weight of their extraordinary legacies into these encounters. Ali, at 38, was a shadow of his former self, his reflexes dulled, his legendary speed diminished. Yet, the “Greatest” still stepped into the ring, drawn by the allure of one last triumph, a final act of defiance against time. Djokovic, though seemingly ageless, is also confronting the relentless march of time. At 36, he remains a formidable force, but the strain of countless battles, the wear and tear on his body, is undeniable.

Holmes, like Mensik, represented the next generation, a product of the very system the legend had helped build. Holmes, though respectful, was ruthless, determined to seize his moment. Mensik, with his powerful serve and fearless groundstrokes, displayed a similar resolve. He wasn’t intimidated by the name or the aura; he played his own game and overcame his hero.

Ali’s defeat was a brutal reminder of mortality, a painful spectacle that left many heartbroken. Similarly, Djokovic’s loss, while not as physically devastating, carries a similar emotional weight. It forces us to confront the reality that even the most dominant athletes are not immune to the forces of nature, that their reign, however glorious, must eventually come to an end.

However, these defeats are not merely about the scoreline. They are about the cyclical nature of sport, the passing of the torch from one generation to the next. They are about the enduring power of mentorship, even when the student surpasses the master. They are about the lessons learned, the legacies forged, and the indelible mark left on the sporting world.

Djokovic, like Ali, has redefined his sport, setting unprecedented standards of excellence. His impact extends far beyond the trophies and records. He has inspired countless young players, including Mensik, to dream big and push the boundaries of what’s possible.

While the sting of defeat is undeniable, it is also a reminder that even in the twilight of their careers, these titans continue to shape the narrative, to inspire awe, and to leave behind a legacy that will endure long after they’ve left the stage. The echoes of Ali’s loss to Holmes, and now Djokovic’s stumble against Mensik, serve as a poignant reminder that even legends are human, and that the story of sport is one of constant evolution, a cycle of rise, fall, and enduring inspiration.